| 62 | 0 | 55 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
科学确定人工林最优轮伐期并评估其投资风险,对于提升林业经营效益、保障投资安全具有重要意义。以广西国有东门林场大花序桉人工林为案例,旨在探究人工林经济成熟规律及投资效益对关键因素的敏感性。运用现金流量分析法,构建基于Faustmann模型的全生命周期评价框架,采用净现值(NPV)、内部收益率(IRR)等动态指标与投资利润率等静态指标相结合的综合评价体系;并通过单因素敏感性分析,识别关键风险因素。敏感性分析表明,木材价格是影响投资效益最敏感的因素,其次为单位出材量和投资成本。培育大径材是提升人工林经营效益的有效途径。人工林投资需重点关注市场风险,建议采取优化经营策略、发展林下经济及建立风险补偿机制等措施以提升项目抗风险能力。研究结果可为人工林经营者的投资决策与风险管理提供理论依据和方法参考。
Abstract:Determining the optimal rotation period and assessing investment risks are crucial for enhancing the profitability and ensuring the security of plantation investments.Taking a Eucalyptus cloeziana plantation in Guangxi State-Owned Dongmen Forest Farm,we explored the economic maturity of plantations and the sensitivity of investment returns to key factors.Utilizing cash flow analysis,a full-life-cycle evaluation framework based on the Faustmann model was constructed.A comprehensive evaluation system combining dynamic indicators such as Net Present Value(NPV)and Internal Rate of Return(IRR) with static indicators like investment profit rate was employed.Sensitivity analysis revealed that timber price was the most sensitive factor affecting investment returns,followed by unit output and investment cost.Cultivating large-diameter timber is an effective way to enhance plantation management benefits.Plantation investments require close attention to market risks.It is recommended to adopt measures such as optimizing management strategies,developing understory economy,and establishing risk compensation mechanisms to improve project risk resilience.The findings provide a theoretical basis and methodological reference for plantation investors' decision-making and risk management.
[1]余智涵,杨红强.基于广义Faustmann模型的营林管理决策方法学研究前沿及展望[J].林业科学, 2024, 60(9):170-182.
[2] FACULTY OF FOREST SCIENCE N U O L, et al. Financial Returns From Collaborative Investment Models of Eucalyptus Agroforestry Plantations in Lao Pdr[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019(87):104 060.
[3] CUONG T, CHINH T T Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Economic Performance of Forest Plantations in Vietnam:Eucalyptus,Acacia Mangium, and Manglietia Conifera[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(3):284.
[4]何霄洁.大花序桉高效栽培技术研究与应用探讨[J].河南农业, 2025, 20(8):37-39.
[5]邱小兰.大花序桉和托里桉生长量及主要材性比较[J].福建林业科技, 2024, 51(2):13-18.
[6]覃祚玉,唐健,覃其云,等.基于Dris法的大花序桉苗期“黄化症”苗圃营养状况诊断[J].林业调查规划, 2023, 48(6):125-131.
[7]李梅,施季森,罗建中,等.我国桉树遗传育种研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6):41-50.
[8]梁新戚.广西桉树人工林高质量发展探索与实践[J].中国林业产业, 2025, 10(5):51-52.
[9]刘媛,张磊,刘正兴,等. 10年生桉树无性系木材干缩性能研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2025, 45(4):194-200.
[10]马忠才,王建忠,邱峙嵩,等. 20个桉树无性系的表型性状多样性[J].桉树科技, 2025,42(3):1-13.
[11]梁馨元.大花序桉Est-Ssr标记开发及种质资源评价研究[D].南宁:广西大学, 2022.
[12]唐再生,王建忠,莫继有,等.大花序桉组培快繁技术及其无性系造林效果的初步评价[J].桉树科技, 2018, 35(3):36-45.
[13]邱炳发,钟连香,熊涛,等.广西35年生大花序桉人工林生长规律研究[J].林业调查规划, 2021, 46(5):20-24.
[14]洪小龙.福建漳州大花序桉生产力与木材力学性质研究[D].福州:福建农林大学, 2018.
[15]何荣,陈健波,唐庆兰,等.不同营养元素配比对大花序桉林木生长的影响[J].安徽农业科学, 2024, 52(15):125-128.
[16]王彦军.资本资产定价理论基础及模型综述[J].科技创新与生产力, 2014, 5(6):37-39.
[17]黎学文,李起泽,吕兰英,等.广西国有高峰林场6年生桉树人工林经济效益分析[J].广西林业科学, 2020, 49(4):613-617.
[18]黄莉雅,黄荣林,黄俊才,等.大叶栎人工林经济效益分析与评价[J].广西林业科学, 2021, 50(3):341-346.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13691/j.cnki.cn23-1539/f.2025.05.005
中图分类号:F326.27
引用信息:
[1]叶家义.人工林经济成熟与投资风险分析——以广西东门林场大花序桉为例[J].中国林业经济,2025,No.194(05):41-50.DOI:10.13691/j.cnki.cn23-1539/f.2025.05.005.